I sincerely appreciate the kind personal kudos I discovered at the tail end of her book, but I am sad and profoundly disappointed that I did not discover an accurate portrayal of complementarity in the body of it.
God-honoring complementarity provides the context for the absolute best pleasure-filled fulfilling sex a human being might experience. It’s the winner. Bar none. Hands down.
The True Woman 2012 Conference starts tonight–and it’s not too late to come! The conference is full to the brim with over 8,000 women, but you can join in via webcast. CLICK HERE for the schedule and Link to the LIVE webstream Join us September 20–22 via a LIVE webstream. In addition to the English stream, […]
Christ’s ideal for sex is exceedingly stringent. So stringent, that it left his disciples’ jaws dropping on the floor. So what are the “erotic necessities” for God-Glorifying sex?
I may just let out a tear and a sniffle in the Courtroom tomorrow, as I watch my oldest son get called to the Bar, into the profession that stands as a small, imperfect, visible symbol of what goes on in the Great Courtroom of God.
If you think good sex produces fireworks, just imagine the fireworks that will take place at the fulfillment of that to which sex points! The thing about living in the shadowlands is that everything good points to something even better.
Though our Coach has assigned husbands and wives complementary positions, He has common expectations of all His players. Complementarity AND mutuality are part of His game-winning plan.
In the rhetoric surrounding gender roles, complementarity versus mutuality is often presented as a “red-pill-or-blue-pill” either-or scenario. But that’s a false dilemma. That’s a pill we don’t have to swallow.
Complementarity & Mutuality aren’t incompatible. In fact, complementarity fosters mutuality. Complementary male-female roles take us from doing a march to doing a dance. Cha Cha Cha!
Jared Wilson recently posted an excerpt that caused some virtual Evangelical fireworks. Though I’m late to the party, I’d like to address an important issue that I perceive to be at the root of the controversy.
What’s a “complementarian?” I’ve read several posts lately from people who misunderstand and/or misrepresent that view. So here’s a primer on the definition of the term from someone who helped coin it.